change joint_pos_penalty_l1's weight to -0.01 due to better performance; add default actuator-level action delay in GO2_CFG_UNITREE.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ GO2_CFG_UNITREE = UnitreeArticulationCfg(
|
||||
stiffness=25.0,
|
||||
damping=0.5,
|
||||
friction=0.01,
|
||||
min_delay=0,
|
||||
max_delay=4,
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
# fmt: off
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -360,15 +360,18 @@ class RewardsCfg:
|
||||
)
|
||||
lin_vel_z_l2 = RewTerm(func=mdp.lin_vel_z_l2, weight=-2.0)
|
||||
ang_vel_xy_l2 = RewTerm(func=mdp.ang_vel_xy_l2, weight=-0.05)
|
||||
# The dof_acc reward is not implemented on the same scale in Gym and Lab.
|
||||
# In Lab, it is computed at the physics-step level,
|
||||
# and because the L2 term is more sensitive to outliers, it can produce a larger penalty.
|
||||
# Thus, we need to use a smaller weight for the dof_acc_l2 term in Lab compared to Gym.
|
||||
dof_acc_l2 = RewTerm(
|
||||
|
||||
# The joint_acc reward is not computed on the same scale in Gym and Lab.
|
||||
# In Gym, it is computed at the policy-step level,
|
||||
# while in Lab, it is computed at the physics-step level.
|
||||
# In Lab, the reward calculation is more precise, and because the L2 term is more sensitive to outliers.
|
||||
# Thus, the reward value is overall higher, so we need to decrease the weights to be suitable for Lab.
|
||||
joint_acc_l2 = RewTerm(
|
||||
func=mdp.joint_acc_l2,
|
||||
weight=-1.0e-7,
|
||||
params={"asset_cfg": SceneEntityCfg("robot", joint_names=JOINT_NAMES)}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
joint_power = RewTerm(
|
||||
func=mdp.joint_power,
|
||||
weight=-2e-5,
|
||||
@@ -421,7 +424,7 @@ class RewardsCfg:
|
||||
)
|
||||
joint_pos_penalty_l1 = RewTerm(
|
||||
func=mdp.joint_pos_penalty_l1,
|
||||
weight=-0.02,
|
||||
weight=-0.01,
|
||||
params={
|
||||
"command_name": "base_velocity",
|
||||
"asset_cfg": SceneEntityCfg("robot", joint_names=".*_(thigh|calf)_joint"),
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user